4 ms·
> That means Goldman customer-service employees get flooded early every month, making it hard for them to keep up. This indicates few things: - How inflexible
by achow 3y ago
> That means Goldman customer-service employees get flooded early every month, making it hard for them to keep up.
This indicates few things:
- How inflexible Apple is in terms of dealing with partners (we already have sense of that with various App Store financial policies, ex. in-app purchases).
- Above specific call-centre example means high cost of operations. To field that many calls at one go, Goldman has to invest in large operations, which at other times would remain under utilised. Why should GS do that which is already touching $1B+ in losses.
- Apple management cannot be bothered with any other operational details outside of their familiar terrain (supply-chain etc).
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- myfavoritetings 3y agoI don't think this really says anything about Apple like you claim. The reality is Apple and GS made a deal and GS may have got the short end of the stick. That's their fault for making the deal that way.