3 ms·
High-end cores you can license? Besides that ARM still seems to be superior to RISC-V in pretty much every way besides the fact that you have to deal with ARM
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
High-end cores you can license?
Besides that ARM still seems to be superior to RISC-V in pretty much every way besides the fact that you have to deal with ARM itself.
Which might also be a positive thing in some cases i.e. designing your own cores from scratch should be much more expensive than licensing from ARM.
- snvzz 3y ago>High-end cores you can license? Yet Ascalon and Alastor can be licensed, today, and ARM has nothing with comparable performance. LG already licensed Ascalon. Nevermind ARM, Apple's current M2 CPUs doesn't compare to Ascalon.
- ffgjgf1 3y agoI’m not sure hypothetical/imaginary (until one can prove otherwise) CPUs count
- snvzz 3y agoThe context was: >High-end cores you can license? And they are cores you can license -and LG has licensed already[0]- i.e. not in any way imaginary or hypothetical. Let's try and not move goalposts. 0. https://www.eetimes.com/jim-keller-on-ai-risc-v-tenstorrents-move-to-edge-ip/ https://www.eetimes.com/jim-keller-on-ai-risc-v-tenstorrents...
- ffgjgf1 3y agoAn actual cpu running actual benchmarks or real world benchmarks seems like a very reasonable goalpost, not sure who is supposedly moving them
- snvzz 3y ago>not sure who is supposedly moving them You, obviously. Your goalpost was: >High-end cores you can license? And now you're trying to turn it into: >An actual cpu running actual benchmarks or real world benchmarks Which constitutes a (failed) attempt to move the goalpost, right after having been given exactly what you asked for.
- ffgjgf1 3y agoIt was perfectly obvious that I was talking about functioning CPUs. But sure congratulations on winning your imaginary argument