4 ms·
> I live in a country where conservatives and liberals co-exist just fine. Israel's biggest ally is a country that has survived just fine. I understand the fear
by invalidname 3y ago
> I live in a country where conservatives and liberals co-exist just fine. Israel's biggest ally is a country that has survived just fine. I understand the fear however.
There used to be consensus here too. After the 6 day war the heads of local Arab municipalities wrote letters to the president congratulating Israel on its victory. The concept of co-existence was something that was promoted and people believed in it.
Unfortunately, this eroded away with the occupation. Most of us don't remember a time of co-existence.
Looking at countries like the USA it seems that the far right has gone completely haywire thanks in large part to social media that pushes to the extremes.
> > The reason they have weak leadership is due to the Israeli right wing which sabotaged that leadership.
>
> What's their end-goal, though?
This varies based on the group. A lot of this is just reactionary. There's an attack on Israeli settlements, so we'll build even more settlements to "show them"... That's insane and dates back to the father of Israels right wing Jabotinsky who said that the conflict can only be resolved when Israel is so strong that no thought of taking it down can ever cross the minds of its enemies. He defined it as a wall of strength if I remember correctly.
That's nonsense obviously. People aren't homogeneous and empires fall. But that dogma still exists in the right.
The settlers are 90% religious. Heavily so. They are the crux of the problem here. Before these attacks an internal conflict was brewing in Israel where the three factions of Israeli life were coming undone. We have many factions but the 3 I'm talking about are:
* Secular - Israel is one of the most secular countries on earth
* Religious right - typically settlers but they live all over
* Hasidic jews - they are tribal and don't really care about any of this. But they have a long standing deal with the right and use it to extort government funds.
The moderate/liberal element has grown tired by the robbery conducted by the hasidic jews and the fact that religious settlers are forcing us into redundant conflicts with the Palestinians. Many said they will refuse to serve in the territories if they're called to duty. Pilots in the IDF resigned from active duty etc.
Palestinian leaders used to joke in the past that the conflict is the only thing keeping Israel together. If they left the Jews alone they would kill each other. This seems pretty accurate. Once this happened everyone who quit showed up in bases and signed up. Even if they disagree with the cause nothing unifies more than a common enemy.
This is all about religion in both sides. Jews wouldn't live in Hebron without being religious extremists. There's no "end game" because they are just f*ing crazy.
Notice that there are the crazier Nazi level players. Historically, these parties were illegal in Israel because they were considered racist. In the last election Bibi made sure they get legalized to leverage their power. I hope a lot of the people who voted for them don't really realize what they are. They don't yell "death to Arabs" or anything like that publicly, so people can delude themselves. But the history of these parties and the subtext is clear to those who pay attention.
> then it behooves Israeli liberals to speak up
Israeli liberals speak up a lot. There are amazing organizations like Betselem (in image) or brothers in arms. They provide testimonials and visual evidence of the crimes in occupation. In Israeli society they are viewed as bleeding heart liberals who are disconnected from the reality of "our enemy".
Organizations like BDS which tries to blacklist Israel end up even worse. It feeds into the "everyone is against us" mentality. The fact that the organization includes key members with terrorism association further cements that notion.
> btw, I don't see any resemblance between the Turkic and the Celtic peoples,
Cypress is an example of such friction. There are many cultural clashes through
Europe between immigrants and whites. This triggered a rise in white nationalism and triggered things like Brexit (also partially against Polish immigration).
We haven't assimilated the current Arab population. There are many problems across the board. There aren't many things on which we have a wide consensus here across the board but this is one them. Both Palestinians and Israelis aren't for this in very large numbers.
> > They failed pretty badly in Afghanistan and Iraq.
>
> Those are massive territories unlike Gaza and WB.
Yes. That does give me a bit of hope. But the problem is more cultural, not just peacemaking. There's deep rooted religion and also historic corruption. Getting the communities to "buy into" a cultural shift would be hard.
- ignoramous 3y ago> Unfortunately, this eroded away with the occupation. Most of us don't remember a time of co-existence. Hebron has proven that much. > The moderate/liberal element has grown tired by the robbery conducted by the hasidic jews and the fact that religious settlers are forcing us into redundant conflicts with the Palestinians Sad that this in turn seeds more divide. > There's an attack on Israeli settlements, so we'll build even more settlements to "show them" I saw on Israeli twitter (https://twitter.com/EliramE/status/1711747425398919667 https://twitter.com/EliramE/status/1711747425398919667) from someone claiming to be "friends with many Arabs" that the Palestine people wouldn't sell their land even when offered millions of dollars (I presume, such deals are the norm for East Jerusalem?). That's a level of resolve I have not known. So, I can see where the "teach them" part comes from: displacement as a means of shame for the Palestine people seems like a valid view. > Jews wouldn't live in Hebron without being religious extremists. Just them wouldn't be so bad, but from what I read, the IDF is on the act, too? > They don't yell "death to Arabs" or anything like that publicly After the deplorable massacre on 7th, it seems like (from observing Israeli tech twitter) that there is prevalence of Islamophobia (ex: https://archive.is/9PV2e https://archive.is/9PV2e) possibly amongst moderates (and liberals alike)? All in the open, for now at least, while emotions run high (of course, antisemitism is rife within Muslims when it comes to this conflict, but even folks who aren't, are generally very angry at Israel continuing to move the Immovable Ladder in Jerusalem, in Hebron, in Judea, in Samaria with every passing day). > Notice that there are the crazier Nazi level players. Sigh. Such irony just writes itself. > Israeli liberals speak up a lot. Glad. I sincerely hope they haven't changed their views post Oct 7, and continue to take a long-term non-violent view. > Organizations like BDS which tries to blacklist Israel end up even worse. Social Media is making it even more worse. In fact, I am terrified of liking a wrong tweet, or writing something stupid here... What a time to be alive where anyone can get cancelled. > Both Palestinians and Israelis aren't for this in very large numbers. This makes the situation in the West Bank even more idiotic from the Israeli PoV. I read that if Israel orders evacuation, settlers are not entitled to compensation (like Gaza and Sinai settlers were)? So, this can still be undone, though, I suspect armed-settlers would to make this a riot-free affair. > Getting the communities to "buy into" a cultural shift would be hard. I guess, the current brouhaha in the Arab world rallying around (dubious) hospital bombing (most likely planted by Hamas) should inform Israel that a majority of the 2b muslims are watching and they won't like war because in this charged conflict it doesn't matter who's righteous / evil anymore (given years of misgivings and mutual distrust). Manufacturing consent from the West matters not if there is no appetite for a multi-front war. Gone are the days when celebrities and prominent political figure heads would "sign a document" in show of support and everyone in their sphere of influence would rally behind them. With the rise of influencers (and disinformation factories), this tactic is done for, for worse or for good. I think had the Israelis waged a "smaller war" (like in 2014), they'd not have triggered such attention. And they can count on getting away with displacement, discrimination, and siege too, like forever. In which case, they'd have to continue to perfect the Iron Wall and continue to work towards fully-autonomous weapons and war machines as deterrence. This outcome would of course suck for Palestine.