12 ms·

This seems to be as open as proprietary game engines as no mention of model license was present in the paper, code, model card. I wonder whether their incorrect

by Zuiii 3y ago

This seems to be as open as proprietary game engines as no mention of model license was present in the paper, code, model card. I wonder whether their incorrect and misleading use of "open" will be caught during peer review. Maybe the authors also believe that Windows is open. Its source code is also publicly available after all.

keirp1 3y ago
The license is in the model card at the top - it's the same as the Llama 2 license.
- Zuiii 3y ago
  > The license is in the model card at the top - it's the same as the Llama 2 license. So the license is indeed proprietary. I hope peer review corrects the authors' misuse of the term.