3 ms·

Logseq is all these things, and open source!

• hiramfromthechi 3y ago
  It's been a while since I spun up Logseq—are you able to use it collaboratively? That's the biggest obstacle for me with these personal knowledge management apps. They're nice to use individually, but when I need to collaborate with someone, there's no way to delegate access—much less granular access.
  • arcastroe 3y ago
    I recently deployed getoutline.com to my personal kubernetes cluster. It's free to self-host and everything is saved in markdown. It also has collaborative features. I believe it's intended for documentation. But I use it as my note taking app.
  • smeej 3y ago
    I haven't tried since I don't have anyone I need to use it with, but there's a way to set it to back up and sync using git (since they're all markdown files anyway). It wouldn't be real-time (you couldn't both have a document open at once), and you'd probably have to remember to push your changes. Syncthing might also work in a rather hacky way, but would probably also run into real-time collisions.
• eichin 3y ago
  Logseq is definitely worth a try just to run the operations through your fingers, and it's amazing for some people - but after roughly a year and a half, I'm about at the point of picking up the two or three things I really like about logseq and porting them back to emacs and plain-ish markdown. (For most people that would just be "use org-mode" but I've bounced off of it a couple of times already and only want a few simple features...)
  • vcg3rd 3y ago
    Logseq almost got me, especially because it allows org-mode markup and is influenced by TiddlyWiki, which I once used heavily. However the interface (like Roam) is too limiting. I am used to split frames of multiple buffers with others a C-x b away, and treemacs and mu4e and Olivetti mode, and eshell, and dired, and...