3 ms·
The point i'm making is that Neal's work was fiction, not a peer reviewed paper from published scientists. You don't need to dispute anything anymore than the
by famouswaffles 3y ago
The point i'm making is that Neal's work was fiction, not a peer reviewed paper from published scientists.
You don't need to dispute anything anymore than the wright brothers needed to dispute Icarus.
Neal was trying to tell a story, not trying to be right.
- giraffe_lady 3y agoThe icarus comparison is apt lol. You don't need to dispute icarus to make an internal combustion flying machine. But when you start beeswaxing feathers to your cloak I'm definitely going to ask what you think about him.