4 ms·
I think it's a well-known Stephenson issue. Here's his response when asked: https://www.reddit.com/r/nealstephenson/comments/5jjwmq/neal_stephensons_response_t
by glial 3y ago
I think it's a well-known Stephenson issue. Here's his response when asked:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nealstephenson/comments/5jjwmq/neal_stephensons_response_to_a_question_on_how_he/ https://www.reddit.com/r/nealstephenson/comments/5jjwmq/neal...
- cl42 3y agoWow, this is fascinating, thank you! Made me wonder whether editors get in the way too.
- awwaiid 3y agoBased on book-mass alone, I suspect Stephenson chomps on editor souls for breakfast.
- afterburner 3y ago> I think Anathem does ok on that score Well, I know at least one person who's read a lot of Stephenson agrees with him on that, so maybe he's improving.
- pteraspidomorph 3y agoI read most of his books and I would agree too.
- dharmab 3y agoI would also agree Anathem has a well paced conclusion.