2 ms·
I haven't been paying attention for a few months, is there a lot of development happening around SDXL or are people still mostly focused on 1.5? My expectation
by thot_experiment 3y ago
I haven't been paying attention for a few months, is there a lot of development happening around SDXL or are people still mostly focused on 1.5? My expectation was that SDXL would probably not see wide adoption for a while because it's hard to make up for the worse training data, is that bearing out?
- GaggiX 3y ago>My expectation was that SDXL would probably not see wide adoption for a while because it's hard to make up for the worse training data Where do you read that SDXL has worse training data? They didn't disclose what the model was trained on like the previous models.
- Veraticus 3y agoMost people (and models) still use 1.5 because of hardware and performance issues with SDXL.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> I haven't been paying attention for a few months, is there a lot of development happening around SDXL or are people still mostly focused on 1.5? There's been a lot happening on SDXL, yes. > My expectation was that SDXL would probably not see wide adoption for a while because it's hard to make up for the worse training data, is that bearing out? What worse training data?
- thot_experiment 3y ago> There's been a lot happening on SDXL, yes. Nice! Care to share any projects/advancements/gens you've found particularly compelling if you have anything handy? > What worse training data? I don't know this, but I think it's a pretty safe assumption given the state of 2.0/the political climate around this stuff, along with the comparative lower diversity of gens I've seen come out of SDXL. I haven't seen anything to the contrary but I'd love to be wrong.