8 ms·
Sorry, I probably got carried away and ended up not making myself understood. I'm fine with the rules as they are for determining who is recognized to vote. M
by mariusor 3y ago
Sorry, I probably got carried away and ended up not making myself understood.
I'm fine with the rules as they are for determining who is recognized to vote.
My intentions were for increasing participation in the demographics which are currently legitimate but are being kept out by external factors (they don't have child minders, they can't take a day off work, ie. the poor), or choosing by themselves to keep out of the process (it's lame to vote, all choices are the same, I have better things to do, ie. the young). You can't have a true democracy if these classes of people are underrepresented in your vote.
- RandomLensman 3y agoFair. I just don't see how there is a causal link between these issues and paper ballots. Poor voting implementations could make participation difficult regardless of the voting method, for example. Similarly, political apathy of sorts isn't cured by abstracting away the politics.
- astroid 3y agoVoting day should be a national federal holiday, that would eliminate most concerns about the poor, lack of 'child minders', day of work, etc. The arguments some people are making in this thread that it -shouldn't- take a day, should only take a 'click', are misguided imo. There is value in slowing down collectively, participating in the process, and seeing the results of that collective action. Reducing it to a task to be completed as efficiently as possible is horribly misguided -- but eliminating the barriers to participate collectively is conversely an admirable goal, which could easily be mostly solved via federal holiday.