3 ms·

The anticheat isn't defective here. It's like running across the DMZ. Your intentions don't matter - ALL anticheat will ban you on sight. You MUST collaborate

The anticheat isn't defective here. It's like running across the DMZ. Your intentions don't matter - ALL anticheat will ban you on sight. You MUST collaborate with the developers to not get banned. This is widely known. It is expected that _any_ software that does this will be banned, that's how anticheat works. They can't tell what your intentions are and they don't need to. If AMD worked with valve they wouldn't have to cross the DMZ at all, instead the engine would call the amd driver without any modifications at all.

AnthonyMouse 3y ago
> The anticheat isn't defective here. It's claiming someone cheated when that person did not cheat. > It's like running across the DMZ. It's like installing land mines in a residential neighborhood and then blaming the residents for stepping on one. It's not even reasonable if you warn them. > They can't tell what your intentions are and they don't need to. They kind of do need to though, because otherwise they punish the innocent. Which is bad. Regardless of whether or not they threaten you with it ahead of time. > If AMD worked with valve they wouldn't have to cross the DMZ at all, instead the engine would call the amd driver without any modifications at all. How is that supposed to work with existing games? There are games where the developers no longer even exist but people still play them.
- filterfiber 3y ago
  > It's like installing land mines in a residential neighborhood and then blaming the residents for stepping on one. It's not even reasonable if you warn them. No this is seriously a DMZ. I cannot stress this enough. Seriously any game with anticheat this is an automatic ban. This is not something unexpected whatsoever, this is what anticheat does. Try this exact same stunt with R6, battlefield, OW, gta, valorant, whatever and you'll get banned almost instantly unless you work with the game developers. It is very literally anti-cheats job to lay down land mines. > How is that supposed to work with existing games? There are games where the developers no longer even exist but people still play them. If there's no anti-cheat there's no problem. If there is anticheat then expect a ban if you try. Anticheat is not mod friendly. You cannot go around modifying the game all you want in online games with anticheat. > It's claiming someone cheated when that person did not cheat. This is correct however Anticheat doesn't allow _any_ modifications to the main game code. Seriously test any anticheat in any online game and this will be a ban. There's very, very, very few exceptions ever made to this.

AnthonyMouse 3y ago

> The anticheat isn't defective here. It's claiming someone cheated when that person did not cheat. > It's like running across the DMZ. It's like installing land mines in a residential neighborhood and then blaming the residents for stepping on one. It's not even reasonable if you warn them. > They can't tell what your intentions are and they don't need to. They kind of do need to though, because otherwise they punish the innocent. Which is bad. Regardless of whether or not they threaten you with it ahead of time. > If AMD worked with valve they wouldn't have to cross the DMZ at all, instead the engine would call the amd driver without any modifications at all. How is that supposed to work with existing games? There are games where the developers no longer even exist but people still play them.

filterfiber 3y ago
> It's like installing land mines in a residential neighborhood and then blaming the residents for stepping on one. It's not even reasonable if you warn them. No this is seriously a DMZ. I cannot stress this enough. Seriously any game with anticheat this is an automatic ban. This is not something unexpected whatsoever, this is what anticheat does. Try this exact same stunt with R6, battlefield, OW, gta, valorant, whatever and you'll get banned almost instantly unless you work with the game developers. It is very literally anti-cheats job to lay down land mines. > How is that supposed to work with existing games? There are games where the developers no longer even exist but people still play them. If there's no anti-cheat there's no problem. If there is anticheat then expect a ban if you try. Anticheat is not mod friendly. You cannot go around modifying the game all you want in online games with anticheat. > It's claiming someone cheated when that person did not cheat. This is correct however Anticheat doesn't allow _any_ modifications to the main game code. Seriously test any anticheat in any online game and this will be a ban. There's very, very, very few exceptions ever made to this.