>This is a non sequitur, if we use it for banking (which is much more critical than voting), why is it a problem if we use electronic technology for voting? Ba

>This is a non sequitur, if we use it for banking (which is much more critical than voting), why is it a problem if we use electronic technology for voting? Banking as a use-case is far more fault-tolerant than elections. Bad transactions can be reversed and redone. You can insure transactions, and all parties involved have visibility into the amounts, senders, and recipients. Elections are one-off events involving secret ballots. You can't have a do-over without throwing the whole system into question. You can't take out insurance for elections.