3 ms·
>I understand what the parent is saying. Respectfully, I think you're still missing the point as demonstrated by your last sentence. >You can't just think abo
by jjulius 3y ago
>I understand what the parent is saying.
Respectfully, I think you're still missing the point as demonstrated by your last sentence.
>You can't just think about how to weave a basket and be a good basket weaver. You have to actually weave baskets and practice.
... right. Which is why OP was saying that it's a mistake to look to a basket weaving executive for their opinions on Ukraine vs Russia. Having skills necessary to succeed in your field of work, or your hobby, doesn't mean that you're smart in every other area. Yes, you are intelligent at a generally high level, but OP was referring to how successful execs are put on pedestals and whose opinions on all kinds of subjects well outside of their wheelhouse are often sought after.
- vorpalhex 3y agoThe whole point of generalized intelligence is that it's broadly applicable. That is my argument position and it is in direct contrast to what the parent is arguing that only specialized intelligence counts. In attempting to counter my argument, you are changing it in your restatement. An executive of a basket weaving company is fundamentally different than Jeff the reclusive basketweaver who can only weave baskets.