4 ms·
> but I can't think of a technical reason we couldn't do NAT with IPv6? We absolutely can do NAT with IPv6, but there's no reason why anyone should (aside from
by sgjohnson 3y ago
> but I can't think of a technical reason we couldn't do NAT with IPv6?
We absolutely can do NAT with IPv6, but there's no reason why anyone should (aside from stateless NAT66 in case you get a dynamic prefix that changes every now and then, but that's about the only use case)