4 ms·
No comment on how instead of retaliating against the thieving website, he's retaliating against the –probably unknowing– users that just happened on those websi
by nephanth 3y ago
No comment on how instead of retaliating against the thieving website, he's retaliating against the –probably unknowing– users that just happened on those websites through Google?
(Some among whom are probably children)
- rozap 3y agoIf I get served a goatse image, I never return to that website. The website wants users, so yes, they're retaliating against the website. But yes, won't somebody think of the children.
- shpx 3y agoYou wouldn't print out this picture, go up to a child you know and show it to them. I would hope. The internet lets you efficiently subject more children to indecent exposure because you don't see it actually happen. Just because people often say "think of the children" insincerely doesn't mean you should never think of them.
- nephanth 3y agoSo every time the image is served, the website is hurt in a marginal, indirect way (-1 user, a bit less revenue stream), while one unrelated user is hurt in a substantial way (somewhere from pretty disgusted to mildly traumatized) Does nobody see the obvious problem?