It's prosecutorial discretion. Generally speaking, they want to charge things that are a combination of big and easy-to-prove. There's nothing beyond conventi

It's prosecutorial discretion. Generally speaking, they want to charge things that are a combination of big and easy-to-prove. There's nothing beyond convention that would stop them from _also_ charging for creating companies under fictious names, for adding a wire fraud count for every e-mail he sent as one of the people, for not including their real address on any marketing e-mails they sent, etc etc.