So essentially it sounds like the court and NAR agreed that NAR is engaging in anti-competitive behavior, but NAR wanted to push for a future get-out-of-jail-fr

So essentially it sounds like the court and NAR agreed that NAR is engaging in anti-competitive behavior, but NAR wanted to push for a future get-out-of-jail-free card? Given that, it seems facile for anyone else to argue that NAR isn't engaging in behavior prohibited by our antitrust laws. If/when we resume robust enforcement of our antitrust laws, NAR would appear to be a prime target. Certainly, their behavior and marketshare are at least as anticompetitive than most of the primary Big Tech targets of antitrust discussion. And NAR hits the biggest transactions most consumers ever engage in, where e.g. folks spend vastly less at Amazon.