The article says “fossils of single celled organisms can easily be confused for rocks”. But the title says does not make the same claim, so the parent comment i

The article says “fossils of single celled organisms can easily be confused for rocks”. But the title says does not make the same claim, so the parent comment is refuting the title not the article. The title implies something like “for any biological process of a living being, there exists a non-living version”. Which is clearly false