> Brownian motion looks random and meaningless to us, but how could you tell it does not look meaningful to someone? Random generator is not a CPU either. >A

> Brownian motion looks random and meaningless to us, but how could you tell it does not look meaningful to someone? Random generator is not a CPU either. >A single atom could hypothetically be powerful enough to compute something. I agree. But if we cannot extract the useful effect, that potential power is diminished to zero.