3 ms·
This is another difference from the US. Certain forms of solidarity action are illegal in the US. The TL;DR of US labor law is: 1. Companies do [very illegal
by aidenn0 3y ago
This is another difference from the US. Certain forms of solidarity action are illegal in the US.
The TL;DR of US labor law is:
1. Companies do [very illegal under local law, up to and including murder] things to bust unions; they buy off the local authorities to get away with this.
2. The Federal government adds specific protections for unions -- many of which don't exist in various European countries.
3. Companies complain that #2 makes unions too powerful, so the Federal government adds specific restrictions on unions -- many of which don't exist in various European countries.
I'm curious about the history in Europe, since an equilibrium seems to have been found without steps #2 and #3.
- mrmanner 3y agoI don’t know about Europe at a whole, but there are examples of unions also employing step 1). Like, announce a strike and then beat up or even murder people working anyway. Also many unions did what business owners had done for centuries and went into politics. The social Democratic party in Sweden for example, is a part of the largest labour union. This is somewhat controversial in some circles, for sure, but changes the power dynamic for steps 2 and 3 a lot.