3 ms·
I would say, based on experience, that kids aged 3 or 4 would be similarly nonsensical, changing number ordering, improvising without any consideration for self
by harperlee 3y ago
I would say, based on experience, that kids aged 3 or 4 would be similarly nonsensical, changing number ordering, improvising without any consideration for self-consistency, and heavily focused in the present irrespective of what has just happened.
- jfoster 3y agoIt's also clearly demonstrating more intelligence than we would generally expect from other animals.
- latexr 3y agoBy that logic, autocorrect and Markov chains would be considered intelligent. As the quote goes: “If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree…”
- latexr 3y ago> I would say, based on experience, that kids aged 3 or 4 would be similarly nonsensical Is that how OpenAI positions ChatGPT? As useful as a four year old knowledge worker? Because that is not useful for the tasks people are giving it. If the best defence that can be mustered to outright wrong answers is that a baby would make similar errors, there’s no point in even discussing OP’s AGI question. A good faith argument would recognise that when comparing to a child, we’re considering at a minimum the age and mental capacity to count and understand what a “multiple of” is.