29 ms·
A question that’s equally interesting to me is the Harappan language itself. David McAlpin et al have presented compelling evidence that Brahui is a sibling la
by dilippkumar 3y ago
A question that’s equally interesting to me is the Harappan language itself.
David McAlpin et al have presented compelling evidence that Brahui is a sibling language to Elamite. To me, the most interesting outcome would be finding that Harappan is another lost member of that family.
- sufiyan 3y agoExactly. Considering that Brahui is a Dravidian language, I always wondered how can regions so disjointed (Pakistan and South India separated by at least a few thousands of kilometres) have a common origin.
- selimthegrim 3y agoI think the current hypothesis is that it was a migration from central or eastern India
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dilippkumar 3y ago> Considering that Brahui is a Dravidian language David McAlpin made a very strong case for Brahui *not* being a Dravidian language, but rather descended from the proto-elamite language family. He showed how Proto dravidian and Proto-elamite could have descended from the same parent language - he calls this Proto Zagrosian. It's a very interesting take and I am personally convinced that he's on the right track.