This might not be the best legal advice, but I personally would let it play out as much as possible before hiring a lawyer. It is my understanding that a prepo

This might not be the best legal advice, but I personally would let it play out as much as possible before hiring a lawyer. It is my understanding that a preponderance of evidence burden (over 50% certainty) in practice really means they have to find at least one potential problem with your defense. Since your blog post provides an explanation that is 100% rational, I'm fairly certain that means they have no case against you. It seems ridiculous to have to pay for a lawyer when you're falsely accused of a crime that you weren't even at the scene for, so to speak. On the other hand, if this is putting too much stress on you, it might be the right call from a health perspective to hire a lawyer. Just my two cents of non-legal tender.