Late? It's not late. > hat is on top of new entrants such as United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rocket, Blue Origin's New Glenn, and other smaller rockets coming

Late? It's not late. > hat is on top of new entrants such as United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rocket, Blue Origin's New Glenn, and other smaller rockets coming online. Then there is the increased flight rate by Virgin Galactic, the return to flight by Blue Origin's New Shepard suborbital tourism rocket, and the potential for high-altitude balloon flights. ... "We see a trainwreck coming," > For example, when SpaceX sought to move its tank farm at Launch Complex 39A in Florida, it submitted... > "The range has an operational bent, and they’ve been very supportive about being able to support our launch rate," > ...has slowed down the company's progress not just on development of the Starship program, but on innovations with the Falcon 9 and Dragon programs as well. So what I read that FAA is involved into all of falcon flights, into object movements within their territory, with new hardware for falcom, with starship, with new entrants.... And why do I need to repeat the article? They propose the following near-term solution: > The company also believes that license applicants should be able to opt-in to help fund independent third-party technical support to assist the FAA surge in the near term while the agency goes through the hiring process.