Sorry for the late response. What I mean by "progressive" here is that ability to divert resource from have to have-not, like progressive tax taking much bigger

Sorry for the late response. What I mean by "progressive" here is that ability to divert resource from have to have-not, like progressive tax taking much bigger percentage from rich folks to fund program that benefits much poorer folks. I think there's a claim that in online dating, top x% (x is a small number) got the majority of the match. Assuming that there's a huge inherent inequality in charisma, likeability, social skills, etc. You cant really distribute them to those who need.