3 ms·
The argument has never been that this is a sufficient criterion for life, but rather that it is necessary and not merely accidental the same way you can be aliv
by marginalia_nu 3y ago
The argument has never been that this is a sufficient criterion for life, but rather that it is necessary and not merely accidental the same way you can be alive and not have legs.
There does not to my knowledge exist things that are considered living that don't have this property of locally decreasing entropy.
- fluoridation 3y agoFair enough. It is indeed true that living things seek to maintain their entropy low.