5 ms·
A major reason for this is that the price point is hardly competitive with black market prices. The federal government was tasked with determining what going pr
by icepat 3y ago
A major reason for this is that the price point is hardly competitive with black market prices. The federal government was tasked with determining what going prices were on the street, and the data was ignored when crafting the price system. It's hard to dislodge an existing dealer-"client" relationship when you offer the same (or often lower quality) product at an inflated price. Then there's also the entire problem with the legal cap on edible strength.
This is a textbook example of a good idea, executed terribly.
- Ridj48dhsnsh 3y agoI don't partake myself, but I've heard that the major selling point in the US is that legal weed is generally of higher quality than what can be found on the street, even in California. Is that not the case in Canada?
- pluc 3y agoIt's arguable. First it will be grown professionally and not in someone's garage so you get some quality standards there. Then there's the enforcement of THC and CBD levels per price tag, which is something the street won't even bother measuring. There's also the strains: there's pretty good variety at official dispensaries, much more than your local dealer has - but it's all designed for occasional users or first timers for acquisition. Store employees also aren't allowed to recommend anything because effects may vary. So there's this whole attempt at making it like a liquor store (which are also nationalized, btw) but without the same... respect for the product or the user I'd say. Liquor stores have pseudo-sommeliers on staff and special origins and shit.
- Ensorceled 3y ago> It's arguable. First it will be grown professionally and not in someone's garage so you get some quality standards there. I think the grey market channels are pretty much the same as the black market channels used to be: some are selling garbage and some of selling better quality than you can get in the legal shops.
- jitl 3y agoIn California and elsewhere in the states Fentanyl dusting / contamination of illegal drugs including cannabis is a very real and scary danger. Cartels try to dust in a tiny tiny amount to make their product hit harder and form a stronger addiction. But if they get it wrong, it will literally kill you. I am happy to pay a premium for a lab tested product with a legal chain of custody and no spooky additives. I imagine it would be the same in Canada, but also curious.
- ess3 3y agoDon’t know too much about the Canadian market but isn’t the convenience of not doing something illegal and it being easily accessible worth paying for. That’s why streaming service’s completely beat out piracy
- cmrdporcupine 3y agoThe committed cannabis smokers don't want to spend the extra money, and the rest of us don't care about it enough to keep all these businesses alive. I live near an ex-urb/suburb of about 20,000 people. There's about 5 Tim Hortons franchises, and I think about 7 cannabis retailers at last count. I strolled into one the other day, a saturday afternoon, and it was a ghost town. Not a person in sight. At least the Tim Hortons have a line-up of addicts at the drive-thru. I suspect anybody who is serious about smoking the stuff either grows their own (you're permitted up to 4 plants, which is a lot really) or "has a guy." I live rural, and I have neighbours on one side open-air growing a bunch of plants. Eagerly awaiting first frost, because right now it smells like a college dorm room outside.
- Waterluvian 3y agoYeah. It’s a worn out political bullet point. The dispensaries are reasonably priced as long as you’re a smart shopper. A lot of the edibles are bad-tasting gimmicks at bizarre price points for how much THC they have. Just don’t buy the junk. I’m sent to the moon on 90 cents worth of THC capsule.
- haunter 3y ago>That’s why streaming service’s completely beat out piracy Are you sure about that? Streaming is incredibly fragmented + the geolocation based limitations (certain shows are available in X country but not in Y, subtitles and dubbing varies a lot to) are increasingly prominent. Piracy will always triumph because of the ease of access and getting what you want in the format you want.
- omginternets 3y agoMusic piracy is much harder today than it was 10 years ago. Your logic is consistent, but it doesn't match reality, which is that piracy is on the decline.
- jitl 3y agoDid the government set prices as well as provide all the packaging? Or do you mean the taxes are so high that there’s no way for a business to break even without a total price substantially higher than the black market? Regardless it sounds fairly successful if 70% of the market is now legal. I wonder how far off the Canada prices are from the California ones I’m familiar with.
- dubcanada 3y agoGovernment does not set the prices, unless you live in one of the provinces which cannabis is only sold at the provincial liquor store. The issue is the taxes are so high it's nearly impossible for a cannabis business to generate income while selling at a price point people will buy it at. You have to remember that generally most of Canada is on the poor side.
- icepat 3y agoAh yeah, by set prices I meant via tax levies. I should have been more clear. It does indirectly set prices, but you're correct they did not say "1 oz sour diesel is $10".
- dubcanada 3y agoCannabis at the store costs anywhere from $90 to $500 a oz, with $120-150 a oz being the average AA grade. The same prices for a "gray market" is typically around $30 to $90 range for a oz of AA grade. Most of the "gray market" cannabis is grown by private individuals or native reservations (which have exploded as nobody will police it). It is typically sold at a store on the native reservation or via mail to order websites. Now in order for you to grow cannabis to sell to the store you have to meet a set of extremely strict criteria that range from a specific amount of acres to soil quality, to harvest techniques and warehousing. You can't grow plants over X height, need permissions from neighbouring property as flowering can be aromatic, you cannot spray or use any non-organic fertilizer, and you have to go through a series of reviews, which cost a lot of money. After that you can then grow cannabis which could be sold to a store. A store then takes that and puts it into extremely expensive special packaging that is child safe, keeps the cannabis hydrated to 65% and all kinds of stuff like that. Now stores tend to promote CBC + THC combinations where you are balanced rather than extremes towards one or the other. As well as beverages which is where I assume they make their actual money. I have no idea what kind of up sale is the average, but you don't really make much off a few people buying 3g or 9g of cannabis in any format minus beverages. Since most of it is taxes anyway. So you end up with a strong "gray market" that grows faster, and cheaper as there is no restrictions and they can spray and use what ever to grow the product faster. And they don't pay taxes. It has nothing to do with any sort of "dealer client" relationship, I don't know a single person who calls up any "dealer" and gets cannabis. Everyone I know either goes to the store and buys it or gets it online mailed to them.
- johnny99k 3y agoThe purpose of legalizing weed was for the government to collect taxes. Even if it was the same price as in the black market, it's going to be more expensive because of the additional taxes added to the final price. This is why legalizing it was never going to work.
- resolutebat 3y agoAnd that's why I still buy all my booze from the Chicago mob.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- geraldhh 3y agosame in germany. you have to get a prescription from a doctor, get registered (and leave a massive paper trail) and then pay the same or more as usual. most consumers don't bother
- Ensorceled 3y agoAnecdotally, there are a fair number of new customers that are there because it's legal. This is especially true for edibles, despite the low THC, and the CBD oil/edible products. I know several people who were avid smokers (even before cannabis was effectively decriminalization after Harper left office and people stopped caring) who still have "their guy" because it is "cheaper and better quality" than what they stores can legally sell. > This is a textbook example of a good idea, executed terribly. Partly this was due to the constraints imposed by the "reefer madness" crowd and partly due to the unexpected gold rush. Also, who would be surprised that people like Bill "Pot is Dangerous" Blair would botch a cannabis roll out. I kind of wish they would do a reset and rework the legislation now that people are less worried about it, but the current political climate makes that impossible.
- icepat 3y ago> "Pot is Dangerous" Blair Or "Cannabis is infinitely more harmful [than tobacco]" Harper. The cards have been stacked against legalisation's success since before most of us were alive.