> Aassuming constant revenue, a move from property to land value tax would create a relative migration from city cores to a highly developed exurbia At this po

> Aassuming constant revenue, a move from property to land value tax would create a relative migration from city cores to a highly developed exurbia At this point it appears you're just ignoring basic economics price sensitivity. Lowering overall taxes on a lot will not cause a migration from that lot. I mean you can just keep repeating that phrase, but it doesn't then make it true. If you continue your argument that eliminating a tax on economic activity in an area will reduce the amount of activity in that area then there likely is little left for us to discuss.