4 ms·
Your environmental footprint for transport is higher though right unless you're cycling everywhere, because you need to travel further? Which involves everythin
by developer93 3y ago
Your environmental footprint for transport is higher though right unless you're cycling everywhere, because you need to travel further? Which involves everything you need that you don't produce yourself. Or you're all entirely self sufficient and never leave your smallholdings? I don't mean to sound like a dick, just trying to engage :-)
- bombcar 3y agoMany “rural” people actually live in small towns where it is entirely possible to drive less or not at all. I certainly put less miles on our vehicles even though we have more of them and kids now vs living in “the big city”. However if all you ever do is drive to the big city I can see how that would take more time and distance.
- flagrant_taco 3y agoThere is a lot of room between being entirely self sufficient and minimizing impact. Simply "needing" less goes a very long way to reducing impact.