Read my original statement. It is a fact that "the press" in the first amendment referred to the printing press. That is indisputable. That courts have expande

Read my original statement. It is a fact that "the press" in the first amendment referred to the printing press. That is indisputable. That courts have expanded that at times or attempted to hone in on its meanings over the centuries is irrelevant to that fact or to my point. It is an opinion, that goes without saying, when I offer: "The 3D printing presses should remain equally free." The right to speak, the right to pursue happiness, the right to print freely on a press, the right to bear arms, the right to liberty, these are all enumerated rights. These are more than enough to cover the right to print in 3D, nevermind that these enumerations are non-exhaustive.