3 ms·
We had this debate back in the 90s when we got our first personal computers in my family. For context I'm part of 4 siblings who are all computer savvy, 3 of w
by INTPenis 3y ago
We had this debate back in the 90s when we got our first personal computers in my family.
For context I'm part of 4 siblings who are all computer savvy, 3 of whom still work in IT. Back then some family members would say "the computer is thinking" when they were waiting for it to do something, the light was blinking, the hdd was grinding.
And us younger family members would always correct them and say "it doesn't think".
So what I'm trying to say is that I 100% agree with you, it shouldn't even be called Artificial Intelligence because I think that's an affront to intelligent humans.
But on the other hand a lot of laypeople will immediately go to that nomenclature because it feels familiar to them.
- robbiep 3y agoI think it should be called pseudo intelligence
- INTPenis 3y agoIt shouldn't be called intelligence at all, it should be called by its technical name which is LLM or whatever the context requires. But that's like asking people to stop saying cloud and start saying KVM, Xen, someone else's computer. It just won't happen.