We should not normalize the presumption of criminal intent, nor restrict even those that have been convicted in the past from utilizing technology just because

We should not normalize the presumption of criminal intent, nor restrict even those that have been convicted in the past from utilizing technology just because it could be used for evil. The purpose of my comment? Reductio ad absurdum. I’m quite surprised at the negative response to be honest. The original comment put no limits on their claims that “utilizing technology” should be regulated. Do people not read comments as a linear progression of call and response?