4 ms·
The definition of suffering is unique and relative to each person. Some might consider boredom suffering while some consider it a necessary path towards creativ
by awb 3y ago
The definition of suffering is unique and relative to each person. Some might consider boredom suffering while some consider it a necessary path towards creativity.
Your idealistic question gets into philosophical territory when you consider what it means to be human without suffering, or wether some forms of suffering can be good.
In other words, your question starts from a premise that might not be shared by others. Whereas, “why is there something instead of nothing” is a widely shared curiosity.
- noonething 3y agoSo then, what is a method to permanently relieve mass human suffering relative to each human, that has practical step-by-step instructions, achievable with modern technology, would be widely believable and easily fundable?
- awb 3y agoSure, but it’s possible that these relatively needs will in all likelihood conflict. So a valid answer might be “you can’t”.