> Why is a divine Mind not “scientific” if the evidence points in that direction? Because 1) begging the question / assuming the conclusion is NEVER scientific

> Why is a divine Mind not “scientific” if the evidence points in that direction? Because 1) begging the question / assuming the conclusion is NEVER scientific and 2) the fact that we evolved in a universe that happens to present the right conditions does not in any conceivable way amount to evidence that anything “tuned” those conditions, it only amounts to evidence that life could find a way to exist and adapt to the conditions present. Is it pretty damned amazing that we are here? Absolutely. Does that imply something planned us? Nope.