> The Australian regulator said that when it asked X how it prevented child grooming on the platform, X responded that it was “not a service used by large numbe

> The Australian regulator said that when it asked X how it prevented child grooming on the platform, X responded that it was “not a service used by large numbers of young people" > The commission also issued a warning to Alphabet’s Google for noncompliance with its request for information about handling of child abuse content, calling the search engine giant’s responses to some questions “generic” It sounds like these giant companies simply needed to provide borderline-competent responses to these basic regulatory inquiries, but instead they phoned it in and got dinged. Hard to imagine how they can be so lackadaisical, especially given the topic of the inquiries.