3 ms·
https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environment-integrity-spec/ https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environme... says: > It would
by josephcsible 3y ago
https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environment-integrity-spec/ https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environme... says:
> It would provide websites with an API telling them whether the browser and the platform it is running on that is currently in use is trusted by an authoritative third party (called an attester).
And https://www.xda-developers.com/google-web-environment-integrity-api/ https://www.xda-developers.com/google-web-environment-integr... says:
> The proposal threatens the free and open internet in a number of ways, but one of the biggest revolves around the fact that should there be a central server that attests to whether a browser can be trusted or not, it means that anything non-standard will not be trusted. In other words, new browsers would not be trusted, and legacy software would no longer be able to access much of the internet after a certain length of time. Given that it verifies the integrity of the browser, it could also technically block certain extensions (such as Adblock) if Google were to go down that route.
- robertlagrant 3y agoI understand what it could be used for - DNS and PKI as centralised structures could also be used to block things. Parler was kicked off all cloud platforms for political reasons. But that doesn't mean that its sole purpose is to verify that you're using an official Chrome build.
- josephcsible 3y agoDNS and PKI have a lot of other purposes, though. What other purposes for WEI can you think of?