3 ms·
More people means more pollution and greater resource consumption. Not everything is beneficial. Human society is well on it's way to the worst case scenario of
by corethree 3y ago
More people means more pollution and greater resource consumption. Not everything is beneficial. Human society is well on it's way to the worst case scenario of global warming and accelerating population growth only exacerbates this issue.
Why make me pay for that?
Negative population growth has benefits. Japan doesn't have a housing crisis like the US.
Like I said two sides to every story. I'd rather have flat population growth not positive growth and helping me pay for child care in a cause I don't believe in is not fair.
- twobitshifter 3y agoEven if you are for depopulation, I think you would still like for the smaller population to be well fed, educated, and socialized. Those people would need to support the older and larger population both economically and in other ways. The fairness argument is just a general argument against all redistribution of wealth, if you are against all redistribution then many popular programs and policies are already failing your moral test.
- corethree 3y agoYeah this can be possible with public schools. Which I already pay for. Why give more handouts to women because they're entitled to it? What do men not take care of kids? Don't we already give benefits to people who are married?