4 ms·

It's mistake they can't fix without breaking existing code or introducing new function. But I'd prefer just a bunch of mux.GET/mux.POST/etc functions instead o

by ilyt 3y ago

It's mistake they can't fix without breaking existing code or introducing new function. But I'd prefer just a bunch of mux.GET/mux.POST/etc functions instead of that.

gavinray 3y ago
Oh damn, no overloading in Go, yeah that rules out the above I suppose. Agreed on the dedicated GET/POST etc functions though.
drdaeman 3y ago
You’ll need new HandleMethod(method, uri, …) anyway, because otherwise you won’t be able to support any less common or non-standard methods.