7 ms·
> Hopefully, the Arab League can convince them one way or the other. I believe, by simply accepting the Israeli citizenship, ALL Palestinians stand a chance to
by invalidname 3y ago
> Hopefully, the Arab League can convince them one way or the other. I believe, by simply accepting the Israeli citizenship, ALL Palestinians stand a chance to fight it out politically, as otherwise, they're anyway "second-rate citizens", regardless of whether they're militant (Gaza) or not (the West Bank).
Israeli citizenship is the crux of the issue. Much of when we consider as the borders of Israel was annexed. That means the people who were there before got full citizenship and rights.
In 1967 when Israel occupied these additional territories they came with a vast number of Palestinians in them. Egypt didn't want Gaza back when a peace treaty was finally signed. Even now they won't let anyone in from Gaza. Jordan didn't want the west bank either.
Israel chose to form settlements to slowly grab land. This was in-part a strategic decision, especially in the west bank where the border is very narrow. This was a poor mistake that was actually started by Nobel Peace prize winner for the Oslo accord Shimon Peres. Yes. The liberals started the settlements.
This was criticized by some smart people at the time such as Yeshayahu Leibowitz who was a fascinating man that saw how occupying another people would destroy the country from within.
Israel specifically chose not to annex the west bank and gaza to avoid citizenship for millions of additional Palestinians. That would completely offset the balance of power in the country. It's just a fucked up scenario. The extreme right parts of the current government have an annexation plan that would not grant citizenship to the Palestinian people effectively becoming an apartheid state officially. Most of the country is against it but I think a lot of the current events are part of their plan.
> > They hope this will enrage the surrounding Arab countries enough to trigger an all out regional holy war for the destruction of Israel.
>
> The powers-that-be, surely aren't that naive given the unconditional support Israel has always had from Europe and the Americas. ALL of their Arab neighbors are in no economic position to wage a war, even if there's political will. But they still went ahead with this despicable plan anyway... I am lost, really.
They did that in the past. In 1973 they nearly wiped out Israel and no one sent troops. Arguably Nixon saved Israel through weapon shipments. But up until now it was one of the deadliest wars in our history. Israel survived by dumb luck to a remarkable extent.
Looking at Ukraine, you fight your wars alone. Support is all good but despite the attack western countries kept buying Russian gas. That fear is very real. Imagine countries cutting off oil to the west if they help Israel...
> Not terrorism when people in uniform do it ;)
Yes. But to be fair Israel does have some cases where investigation resulted in surprising outcomes. E.g. a couple of years ago a terrorist (real one) was shot while trying to stab a soldier. He wasn't dead, just lying down neutralized. A soldier took his weapon and killed him.
That soldier stood trial and went to jail despite the right-wing going apeshit over this...
> From Israeli (tech) twitter, the sentiment I get is... all of Gaza is enemy, and couldn't care less if IDF nakba'd them a bit more in to Sinai.
Yes. I'm afraid this is pretty terrible in the news comment section too.
A lot of this is due to a misconception about the Palestinians and gaza residents. During the day of the attack one of my spouses students was in a safe root with her kids corresponding with us. Amazingly they all survived (house burned down but considering literally half of their village died... that's good). There was no news so we went on Instagram and looked at their hashtags. The videos published and cheered by the Hamas supporters were just horrible. It's hard to think about the human side.
We all know people and lost people. I was looking at John Oliver today and he showed a clip I didn't see here about a young guy who lost his brother. He was specifically talking about how his brother wouldn't want innocent Palestinians hurt.
The problem is we don't see those things here... When I was a kid they took us to a holocaust museum and showed us what people wrote on the walls in death camps. That fucks up kids minds. It's all cries for vengeance. Right now the media is pumping out every demonstration and every anti-semantic sentiment, this creates a "we don't have anywhere else to go" mentality. A persecution complex that weighs heavily on everyone here. All of these things come together. Even when we see the innocent victims, the blame goes to the Hamas. That's partially true (obviously), but it's disheartening.
Another thing that wasn't really reported here is the low support for the Hamas. People think that the Hamas won an election. They got 40% of the votes and even then the vast majority were in favor of peace. Yet, that latter part is missed. People justify violence because there's an assumption that the majority in Gaza chose violence and then celebrated in the streets when it happened.
> if Israel remains a democracy
I doubt it will still be a democracy even for us when the dust settles...
> Hamas have estimated 40K "fighters" (but lets face it, they're not really a match, they'll be slaughtered if not by the Army
If you have no morals and 2M human shields to hide behind this can stretch for years. Look at the much larger US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. Finding them is a needle in a haystack.
> Tear up the farce that was the US-brokered Oslo Accords and the UK-brokered Mandate, and undo the partition. Offer a life of dignity, peace, prosperity, and purpose to peoples who consider themselves refugees in their own homeland. Making the Palestinians accept citizenship can be forced by the Arab League. Easier said than done, of course (:
That is something no one wants. It will be a disaster.
Israel is a liberal democracy. We have things such as gay rights, women's rights, etc. Even with our religious factions this is sometimes a problem. Unfortunately, there's a lot in common between religions in that sense. It will send us back to a point we can't get beyond.
That's if we're actually able to stop the terrorists. To do this we would need to remove the walls. That means we will go back to suicide bomber of the week. Three busses exploded in the street where I lived right next to my building. A coffee shop I was in was blown up. We can't go back to that, we need a border.
- ignoramous 3y agoThanks for your response. I am an arm-chair observer; I can only make broad-ranging assumptions. You know best. > That means the people who were there before got full citizenship and rights. Most left but some were forcefully expelled. Then, not allowed to return (like the people of Al-Majdal (Ashkelon), a holy place for Shia' muslims, as one example). > ...how occupying another people would destroy the country from within. Speaking as a non-Israeli, the only destruction I see is that of the Palestinians. tbh, the Oslo Accords and the Mandate is destroying Palestinians more than it is destroying the idea of Zion... so if I was a Zionist, I'd say things are working as planned. > That would completely offset the balance of power in the country. It's just a fucked up scenario. To me, the constant oppression from one side and the retaliatory and heinous struggle from the other side is even more fucked up. There must be a path to assimilation, because how long does Israel otherwise continue to supress 5 million strong populace without having an eventual intention of removing them for their lands/islands (or worse, this Earth)? Painting such broad strokes (all Palestinians want is to exterminate Jews) is part of the problem (may be the Gazan kids, if given a choice, would aspire to study at Technion, participate in the booming Israeli cybersecurity scene in Herzlia... over being under constant surveillance of Israeli drones and pray that autonomous weapons don't misfire every time they're at a crossing). > They did that in the past. In 1973 they nearly wiped out Israel and no one sent troops... Imagine countries cutting off oil to the west if they help Israel... In all honesty, most Arab countries that matter have been run in to the ground by Dictators (Egypt) or solely serve their Emirs (UAE, Saudia, Qatar). Some only have a puppet military (Kuwait, Bahrain). I don't expect it to happen again. The wars in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan reaffirmed that there's no such thing as ummah, that these multiple countries are not a single military bloc. Hamas should know that no one's coming for them when US gets involved (which it did, as expected): and especially after what happened in 2014. > It's hard to think about the human side. True. Entire generations lost to this. Like the Atheist he was, Moshe Dayan thought collective punishment was an effective way to tame the Fidayeen (terrorists, as one might call them today), and the Israelis, it seems, have never come out of that mode, but in fact have doubled down on it. And the cycle keeps repeating. The nakba, the Oslo Accords, the Gazan disengagement didn't break it. If it continues, there's never going to come a time this human side emerges, on either side of the fence, until there's fence no more (or no Palestines any more). I just happen to read first-hand account of an Afghani-British author traveling around in Gaza in 2008 (https://twitter.com/nadeneghouri/status/1713120289213845671 https://twitter.com/nadeneghouri/status/1713120289213845671), and she says PTSD, low life expectancy, and poverty is rife through the populace. They deserve better than this (unless of course one thinks that Nadene is spreading propaganda for Hamas). > Right now the media is pumping out every demonstration and every anti-semantic sentiment, this creates a "we don't have anywhere else to go" mentality. Consent must be manufactured some how. All too predictable, but disheartening to see many of my heroes go genocidal on (tech) twitter. As a Shia' (Palestine is Sunni), I couldn't hold my tears reading the tweets they liked or reposted. As an aside, some of these same folks are working towards building an AGI. > I doubt it will still be a democracy even for us when the dust settles... Why do you say so? Or, you mean the far-right will gather more support? > 2M human shields to hide behind this can stretch for years... Sucks for the Gazans, most of whom are kids (a million of them displaced in a week already), and if Hamas proactively gives up arms without getting anything substantial in return (not mockery-making lip-service like the Accords; but something like ending apartheid and going back to the 1948/67 borders or grant the right to citizenship). > Israel is a liberal democracy. We have things such as gay rights, women's rights, etc. It is liberal except for when it comes to the treatment of Palestinians, it'd seem? I think this is a secondary concern, because it doesn't excuse the existence of an apartheid state in its lieu. Almost as if Israel wants to have the cake and eat it too. > Even with our religious factions this is sometimes a problem. Palestinians or not, as has happened with other Islamic states, in the long run, I can see Israel struggling to hold on to its liberal values for this very reason. I am not a prophet, but there exist folks who believe in such prophecies. > It will send us back to a point we can't get beyond. I agree it is a pandora's box, but 75 years of hurt must be enough to try and open it? EU emerged from a heinous war in less than 50 years by tearing down borders. If I was an Israeli, and I see that Palestine will always be at a disadvantage, I would rather we continued to invest in lasers, and robots, and other utopian defense systems to permanently trap these people over trusting them. And that sucks, but I guess it keeps the Holy Land and its LGBTQ+ supporting democracy mostly "untouched", for the time being. Such an unimaginable tragedy, this.