4 ms·

At x+10 anyone could make a new sequel to Zork Would the copyright holders of Zork get royalties in this scenario, like with cover versions of songs? The othe

by dagw 3y ago

At x+10 anyone could make a new sequel to Zork Would the copyright holders of Zork get royalties in this scenario, like with cover versions of songs? The other problem is that in this scenario people will just be slapping the names of things that were popular x+10 years ago on literally anything. People will just make the lowest effort loot box laden pay-to-win mobile games you can get onto the App Store, and advertise them as sequel or tie-in to that old popular game/book/movie.

ethbr1 3y ago
> royalties Debatable. Some sort of FRAND-level payment, for a limited period, seems fair? Not enough to torpedo the economics of anyone using a property. But enough so an originator has a revenue stream for wildly-popular IP. > slapping popular names Would this be that bad? If there were Harry Potter crap... how would that be different? Expect there'd be more stuff out there.
- dagw 3y ago
  Would this be that bad? It's essentially a case of brand dilution. Today 'Harry Potter' is a brand that has certain values. If a new Harry Potter book shows up on the shelves tomorrow I can be very sure it's a kid friendly, easy to read, book about wizards. People can feel safe buying as a present for their niece or grand child that likes Harry Potter. In this alternate future a 'Harry Potter' book could be literally anything. If that is 'good' or 'bad' is left as an exercise to the reader, but something would definitely be lost.