> MRNA doesn't modify genes, that's not how MRNA works at all You are repeating how the tech works in theory, not how the vaccines work in reality. In reality

> MRNA doesn't modify genes, that's not how MRNA works at all You are repeating how the tech works in theory, not how the vaccines work in reality. In reality, the vaccines can do this. That's because the "process 2" manufacturing that was switched to post-approval scales much better but yields vaccines heavily contaminated with DNA, not just RNA. If you smuggle DNA into cells using the lipid nanoparticle tricks then it can be incorporated into your own DNA yielding never ending spike protein production and immune tolerance. There's testimony by a scientist who sequenced residue from vials and discovered the problem here, but it was suspected even before that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY He says he would no longer take the vaccines knowing what he knows now. There are a whole bunch of case reports where this appears to have happened. Patients who end up always testing positive for spike protein for example, despite not being infected with SARS-CoV-2. > The whole thing reads like the Dunning-Kruger effect in action. It's actually the opposite. Over-educated people constantly confuse the map for the terrain due to a naive belief in the angel-like nature of everyone in the same social class as themselves. Then they assume anyone who disagrees must be misinformed. The people who are most pro-COVID vaccine are, in my experience, people with degrees who also know very little about it beyond what they've been told by pop sci media and public health authorities. The idea that what they've told might not be true is just inconceivable to them, and the luxury belief of intellectual superiority to the rubes is just too tempting to pass up. People who are skeptical are engaging directly with the collected evidence, not just what theory says that evidence should be.