3 ms·
I'd dare to say one of the reasons is quite simple - Bing's ugly UX. When Google was just starting to gain popularity its search results weren't much better th
by blackhaz 3y ago
I'd dare to say one of the reasons is quite simple - Bing's ugly UX.
When Google was just starting to gain popularity its search results weren't much better than Altavista's. Yet, its interface was much cleaner, it loaded and spewed out results faster, the overall experience was better. Bing is the Altavista. The user is bombarded with cookies, logotypes, ads, maps - all that complex layout right from the start. As a user you feel napalmed by information, and nobody likes that.
- zo1 3y agoBecause Google has conditioned users and the web content creators according to its UX and content standards. It's a vicious cycle.
- bonton89 3y agoIt has been a long time so I honestly can't remember. I thought Altavista had a relatively clean homepage. I do remember yahoo's home page was terrible, although I think there was a clean search.yahoo.com page no one knew about. Back then (and even now) having the search page load fast was pretty important so this always seemed like a nasty own goal.