4 ms·
Who cares ? AFAIK the parliament is against snooping, so it won't pass.
by bestouff 3y ago
Who cares ? AFAIK the parliament is against snooping, so it won't pass.
- agilob 3y agoIt won't pass >this time<
- rdm_blackhole 3y agoIt will pass this time. The Swedish politician is in the pocket of big tech corporations.
- jeltz 3y agoYes, Sweden is pushing for this but the Parliament will again block it. Swedish politicians can't force it, that is not within their powers.
- PhilipRoman 3y agoIMO this has nothing to do with big tech. End to end encryption does not prevent big tech from reading your messages if you use their provided client. The importance of money in politics is greatly overstated, this is just government wanting more control.
- Xelbair 3y agobecause they keep trying again and again, ad nauseam?
- DocTomoe 3y agoIt's the EU way of doing things. Data retention gets killed by courts every year, and every year a new iteration is being proposed by politicians. Remember the Lisbon Treaty, which necessitated a referendum in Ireland - which was repeated until the politically desired result was in.
- melesian 3y agoArrant nonsense. The Irish rejected the Lisbon Treaty. It was then amended to address Irish objections and then approved, not just by the Irish electorate (whose approval is constitutionally required for all constitutionally significant legislation) and then by 27 other EU member state parliaments. Clearly, you have have no idea whatever what you're talking about, and subscribe to conspiracy theory BS without bothering to do any homework because it fits your prejudices
- mariusor 3y agoEvery legislative body has the option to try again on things they want to pass as we've seen in the US in the past year. At least the council doesn't have the capability to pass the laws without the cooperation of the EU parliament.
- alphanullmeric 3y agounless it’s financial privacy