2 ms·
"always was" is such terrible rhetoric. hand-wavey and without substance. A thought terminating cliche. It honestly makes crypto look desirable, and buildings
by barrysteve 3y ago
"always was" is such terrible rhetoric. hand-wavey and without substance. A thought terminating cliche.
It honestly makes crypto look desirable, and buildings designed with sensor blocking materials. You can't passively surveil a data-center. Why should my home, office or shopping mall be any different?
The powers-that-be never gave us a choice to opt-out. It's been a slow gradual decline.
We have to incentivize haggling over our own data. My unseen/unknown data is my asset and I will protect it's financial value.
We can't trust random joes to not sell out crypto exchanges and the like, so you have to build technology that functions as a manual crypto exchange - without a developer on it's back to pull the ripchord and destroy the technology whenever money shows up.
Manual software is key, as soon as it becomes "automated", some developer has to be roped into hand-holding it through tech changes. Crypto software that only exists because a man put it together and went hands-off, is Key.
Then you can build the normal philosophical/structural/relationship management ideas on top of that.