>I thought that Beagle Company was more tied to TI chips than this, I didn't expect a non-TI chip to come out of their boards. I would say it's simpler than th

>I thought that Beagle Company was more tied to TI chips than this, I didn't expect a non-TI chip to come out of their boards. I would say it's simpler than that: TI failed to release a RISC-V chip in a timely manner, whereas BeagleV (correctly) identified the direction the industry is moving towards.