2 ms·
I could. But I could also write the whole thing in assembly or go. I want a language that does everything I want and that includes a clean async api. I think th
by corethree 3y ago
I could. But I could also write the whole thing in assembly or go. I want a language that does everything I want and that includes a clean async api. I think there's a hole here because what "I" described as what "I" want is what a lot of people want.
- withoutboats3 3y agoYou are commenting on a very long post in which I explained in detail how green threading wasn't compatible with Rust's lack of garbage collection. Your response is to just insist that you wish that wasn't the case - that you could have no garbage collection and user-space concurrency without any special syntax. Just repeating a demand in the face of an explanation as to why it isn't possible isn't going to get you far. I actually think what you want is green threading and garbage collection and the language I described at the end of my post, but you've sort of ideologically decided garbage collection is bad for whatever reason.
- corethree 3y agoNo I'm saying just do allocations and box under the hood for async await. Not for rust but for the ideal language people want but is missing. Rust obviously has a zero cost objective. I'm not directly talking about that.