> And the fact that Chrome overran Firefox does sit with the Mozilla, whatever the argument is about competitive practices. I mean, Mozilla couldn't afford to

> And the fact that Chrome overran Firefox does sit with the Mozilla, whatever the argument is about competitive practices. I mean, Mozilla couldn't afford to pay Adobe, Avast, etc $3 per user to install an unwanted browser for years even if they'd cross the moral and ethical line to do so. So a chunk of that was outside of their control. Firefox uses an entirely different engine underneath. So, from a 'health of the web' perspective, it helps prevent the mono-culture. It also supports extensions on Android, which is quite nice, and syncs my stuff between them. It can't support them on iOS since everything is just Safari Lite underneath.