> live in a world where everything is out in the open the only outcome would be mass panic. en plein air decision making has already been tried several times

> live in a world where everything is out in the open the only outcome would be mass panic. en plein air decision making has already been tried several times throughout history, it never worked as intended. social networks are an experiment in that sense and have been weaponized against the people using them in a very short time. secondly: that would not stop propaganda, which is the real problem, we would only know what people say they think, not what they really think. also I am not really fine with everyone reading my messages, some things need to stay private to live peacefully and/or not harm other people's feelings.