3 ms·
Frankly I'd rather pay a subscription for a quality operating system that meaningfully improves over time then get a free one that feeds me ads, wastes my time,
by Hammershaft 3y ago
Frankly I'd rather pay a subscription for a quality operating system that meaningfully improves over time then get a free one that feeds me ads, wastes my time, and frustrates me.
I'm just skeptical MS is capable of delivering on a higher quality OS.
- readams 3y agoUnfortunately I think what we'll get is an operating system that you pay for and that feeds you ads and wastes your time. Both are possible!
- ssnistfajen 3y agoWhy not require a subscription and then still show ads to subscribers? It's what the leeches I mean shareholders must've wanted.
- Tommstein 3y agoWhich is exactly what will happen.
- snickerbockers 3y agoThey can even take a page out of paramount+'s book by charging extra for an "ad-free" tier that merely shows you less ads than the other tiers.
- Tommstein 3y ago> Frankly I'd rather pay a subscription for a quality operating system that meaningfully improves over time then get a free one that feeds me ads, wastes my time, and frustrates me. This is Windows we're talking about, you will pay for the former and receive the latter.