While they certainly have incentive to downplay revenue for the purposes of paying Oracle, let's not forget that all of the contributing revenue factors would b

While they certainly have incentive to downplay revenue for the purposes of paying Oracle, let's not forget that all of the contributing revenue factors would be legally discoverable. I think that we can assume that the numbers contributed in court reflect the revenue fairly accurately - Fortune 500 companies tend to have lawyers whose degrees don't come in specially-marked boxes of cereal. Also, Google has a lot of very good incentives to state their revenue exactly as is legally relevant (albeit, not a penny more, in this case).