3 ms·
It was really strange how QNX had a full multitasking GUI operating system for Intel, back in the days when there was a faint chance of competing against Window
by andrewstuart 3y ago
It was really strange how QNX had a full multitasking GUI operating system for Intel, back in the days when there was a faint chance of competing against Windows, and yet the QNX company had no interest at all in taking QNX to market beyond embedded systems.
- fuzztester 3y agoYes. I had tried it out, for a while, many years ago, at a time when Linux distros fitted on CDs, not DVDs. Installed it off a CD that came with PC Quest Magazine, onto a partition on my PC. QNX was really fast, not just compared to Windows, but even compared to Linuxes of the time.
- jonhohle 3y agoIt even had reasonable device support (what I cared about worked) and a web browser. I’m sad that they dropped Nutrino, but am glad it existed.
- bregma 3y agoNeutrino still exists and it's running your car. In fact you can still buy it for home use. It's just not Free. Or "free" as in Windows.
- fuzztester 3y agoNeutrino, I guess. Cool. And I think the GUI module (for lack of a more appropriate word, subsystem, maybe) was called Photon.
- bzzzt 3y agoBy the time that demo floppy was release (1999) Microsoft already had become the 'default PC OS'. Also, Microsoft had Windows _and_ Office, server software to network a company (NT) and for home users about all the PC games they could dream of. QNX had a very impressive demo, but never really had a chance of competing, otherwise they would have lost from free Linux distributions that had more software at the time.
- bluedino 3y agoThey didn't have any software and didn't emulate dos or windows Why would anyone run it
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]